Republicans in a tizzy over McCain’s “centrist” policies

Color me astounded. No, really. For years, conservatives have told me that Dems need to be willing to work with Conservatives and reach across the aisle, be more centrist, blah blah blah. As it turns out? All horse crap.

Witness the histrionic hand waving over John McCain’s moderate stances on the  environment and stem cell research.

McCain has not yet signaled the changes he plans to make in the GOP platform, but many conservatives say they fear wholesale revisions could emerge as candidate McCain seeks to put his stamp on a document that currently reflects the policies and principles of President Bush.

“There is just no way that you can avoid anticipating what is going to come. Everyone is aware that McCain is different on these issues,” said Jessica Echard, executive director of the conservative Eagle Forum. “We’re all kind of waiting with anticipation because we just don’t know how he’s going to thread this needle.”

Can you imagine?! The HORROR! John McCain, the Republican nominee, actually trying to be centrist during an election year! Much as I’m sure most Republicans would like to forget this, it should be pointed out that George Bush ran on a centrist platform his first term as well. “Compassionate conservatism.” Remember?

Here’s the thing. Conservatives have got to get over the idea that they get to put a candidate into office who doesn’t reach across the aisle. The last four years have completely hosed it for them. And John McCain is going to need those centrists to have a hope in hell of being elected, because short of asking Mitt Romney or Mike Huckabee to be his running mate, the religious base is going to take a pass on this one.

Republican special interest groups are acting like spoiled children throwing temper tantrums:

“That is the one issue that we’re always ready to fight on,” Echard said. “We will never take that plank for granted. We want zero changes in it. We don’t want a comma changed. We don’t want a word inserted.”

(this in regard to the anti-choice platform, of course. We can’t have these women thinking they have control over their own bodies! Make ’em raise that baby as a punishment! That’ll larn ’em.)

Okay, I’m obviously being less than objective, but quite frankly, I’m flabbergasted at the sheer refusal on the part of conservatives to recognize that some re-tooling of their platform is not only advisable, but necessary. We’ve spent ourselves into a major recession. The dollar is worth bupkis. When the peso starts to look better against it, it’s time to panic, kids. The bitter and divisive war of entitlement waged by the religious right is getting less and less easy to ignore. Our infrastructure is falling around our ears. And while Nero plays on in the Oval Office, an aging conservative tries to rally the troops back to a sane position. But the troops are having none of it, because they want what they want.

Remind me again…Dems should be more like conservatives….why?

3 responses to “Republicans in a tizzy over McCain’s “centrist” policies

  1. Romney adds a net nothing to the ticket; his negatives at least approximate the positives.

    McCain NEEDS Alaska Gov Sarah Palin (if he wants to win in November) — whose positives are too numerous to mention here (with no negatives).

    – and don’t cite Palin’s lack of experience, since she’s got 10 times that of Obama!!!

  2. What do McCain’s centrist views have to do with Bush the failed President? I voted for him. I am a conservative Republican. Yes, perhaps I was wrong. However, conservative ideology didn’t fail; George Bush failed. And miserably. By the way, you should be happy with Bush. His budgetary policies were those of a liberal. We’ve seen the largest expansion of government since LBJ ran wild with welfare in the 60’s. I’ll be voting for McCain, because I believe in capitalism, just like you should vote for Obama, because you believe in socialism. And neither of us should be upset or surprised that certain issues are off the compromise table.

  3. leftcoastlibrul

    Dear all; thank you for the posts.
    Ted: I don’t cite anyone’s “lack of experience.” As I said in a previous post: The only person able to claim “experience” when it comes to the job of POTUS is one that’s running for his second term.

    Hope: I appreciate your post, but as usual, telling people what they believe doesn’t really work with liberals & atheists; they tend to make up their own minds about that.

    Bush may have run us into the ground with his “liberal” agenda (and incidentally; if it was so liberal, we’d have a lot more dollars invested in social programs than we do failed military programs), but the Republican congress did nothing for six years but rubber stamp it for him. The government didn’t really get bigger, it just cost us more. This is the problem when there are no checks and balances. Printing more money isn’t capitalism; it’s stupidity. At some point, we are going to have to pay the bill. We can pay it now while it’s still relatively painful, or pay it later, when our dollar will be worth less than Lira. Which would you prefer? A few taxes on a strong dollar, or all your dollars which are worth toilet paper? Decide quickly.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s